Platform Guides
Can You Put a Logo or Watermark on MLS Listing Photos?4 min read
Platform Guides
TL;DR:As of January 1, 2026, California's AB 723 requires California real estate agents to disclose and show the original photo when a for-sale listing image has been digitally altered โ but routine adjustments like color correction, sharpening, white balance, and exposure are explicitly exempt. This is a for-sale-listing rule, not a rule for Airbnb or Vrbo rentals.
This isn't legal advice โ it's a plain-language summary of a real law, sourced from CRMLS's own FAQ on the requirement, so you know where the actual line is instead of guessing. If you're a California agent, confirm the specifics with your broker or MLS before relying on any of this.
Written and maintained by the voxelyo team ยท Published ยท Updated ยท 5 min read
California Business and Professions Code section 10140.8 (AB 723) requires a real estate broker or salesperson โ or someone acting on their behalf โ who includes a digitally altered image in an advertisement for the sale of real property to disclose that alteration. The disclosure has two parts: the image has to be labeled with a term like "digitally enhanced," "digitally altered," or "virtually staged," and the original, unaltered photo has to appear immediately before or after the altered one. CRMLS implements this as Rule 11.5.2. A first violation gets a warning; if it isn't corrected, the penalty is a $250 fine.
The law defines a digitally altered image as one changed with photo-editing software or AI to add, remove, or change physical elements โ furniture, appliances, walls, fixtures. That covers virtual staging, item/clutter removal, and anything that changes what a buyer would actually see walking into the room. CRMLS's FAQ explicitly carves out routine adjustments: lighting, sharpening, white balance, color correction, angle, straightening, cropping, and exposure โ as long as they don't change how the property itself is represented. That carve-out is specific enough to map directly onto what a denoise/sharpen/ upscale/color-correction pipeline does.
Auto adjusts exposure and sharpness and may resize a small image. Vivid and Twilight apply fixed color grades; Twilight does not replace a sky or generate lighting. The separate AI sky-replacement mode can change scene content. Judge the actual output: CRMLS permits common photographic adjustments only when the property remains faithfully represented. A mode name does not establish compliance. For uncertain edits, follow your broker's and MLS's disclosure process and retain the original. See the CRMLS guidance (checked October 2, 2026).
As written, no. AB 723 covers advertisements for the sale of real property made by a licensed broker or salesperson. A short-term rental listing isn't a sale-of-property advertisement, and an Airbnb or Vrbo host isn't acting as a real estate broker when they list a rental. If you're a host, this specific law doesn't reach you โ though it's worth watching whether other states or platforms follow California's lead, the way disclosure requirements have spread between states before.
No โ AB 723 specifically covers advertisements and promotional material for the sale of real property, created by a real estate broker or salesperson or someone acting on their behalf. Short-term rental listings on Airbnb or Vrbo aren't sale-of-property advertisements, so they fall outside this law as written. It's a real-estate-for-sale rule, not a general short-term-rental rule.
Based on the CRMLS FAQ interpretation of the law, no โ lighting, sharpening, white balance, color correction, angle, straightening, cropping, and exposure adjustments are explicitly listed as permitted adjustments, as long as they don't change how the property itself is represented. That covers the core of what a denoise/sharpen/color-correction pipeline does.
This is closer to a gray area worth being careful about: a twilight/day-to-dusk conversion changes an element of the photo (the sky and overall lighting mood) beyond a correction to the original capture. If you're a California real estate agent using twilight-style images in for-sale listing marketing, the safer approach is to treat it like any other altered image under AB 723 โ label it and keep the unaltered original available. This isn't legal advice; check with your broker or MLS for how they're interpreting it.
Per the CRMLS summary, a warning comes first, then a $250 fine if the issue isn't corrected in a timely manner. It's not a huge penalty on paper, but it's also not worth risking when the fix โ labeling a photo and keeping the original โ costs nothing.
Sources: CRMLS Knowledgebase FAQ on California's Altered Image Law (AB 723); California Business and Professions Code section 10140.8. This page is informational only and is not legal advice.
Next step
Review photo correction for agents โSee which edits are available and what remains unchanged.
Platform Guides
Can You Put a Logo or Watermark on MLS Listing Photos?4 min read
Platform Guides
Airbnb vs Vrbo Photo Requirements: What's Actually Different3 min read
Platform Guides
Why Listing Photos Get Scrolled Past (And How to Fix Each One)4 min read